Four Critiques of the Redistribution Hypothesis: An Assessment

Publication: European Journal of Political Economy. vol. 26, no. 1. pp. 147-154

Date: March 2010

Abstract:

The reformulation of the median voter hypothesis and its testing proposed in Milanovic (2000) has been criticized from four different perspectives. The critiques are discussed and assessed.

Link: Four Critiques of the Redistribution Hypothesis: An Assessment

2019-08-27T11:04:33-04:00March 1, 2010|

Research Assistants collaborate with our faculty, affiliated scholars, and postdoctoral scholars in producing research related to inequality.

About the Scholars’ Blog

The Stone Center’s blog is a forum for our scholars to discuss their research and weigh in on academic and policy matters related to inequality. The views expressed here are those of the authors and should not be construed as those of the Stone Center.

Postdoctoral Scholars are appointed to the Stone Center for two years to produce research on topics related to inequality.

About the Scholars’ Blog

Affiliated Scholars join the Stone Center from universities and institutions around the world to collaborate with our distinguished team, participate in events, and disseminate their research.

About the Scholars’ Blog

Learn more about Stone Center Core Faculty/Senior Scholars.

About the Scholars’ Blog

By Category

By Tag

Culture & Society

Political Beliefs/Public Opinion Gender Race/Ethnicity Migration Status Age Groups Family Structure Educational Attainment

Policy & Institutions

Economic Policy Social/Family Policy Redistribution Taxes Macroeconomy Unions

By News Category

By Research Category

By Scholar

By Focus Area Tag